social sciences
special features
about glbtq

Advertising Opportunities
Press Kit
Research Guide
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
site guide
search tips
research guide
editors & contributors
contact us
send feedback
write the editor
Subscribe to our free e-mail newsletter to receive a spotlight on glbtq culture every month.
e-mail address:
Popular Topics in Social Sciences
Stonewall Riots Stonewall Riots
The confrontations between police and demonstrators at the Stonewall Inn in New York City the weekend of June 27-29, 1969 mark the beginning of the modern glbtq movement for equal rights.
Gay Liberation Front
Formed soon after the Stonewall Riots of 1969, the short-lived but influential Gay Liberation Front brought a new militancy to the movement that became known as gay liberation.
The Sexual Revolution, 1960-1980 The Sexual Revolution, 1960-1980
The sexual revolution of post-World War II America changed sexual and gender roles profoundly.
Leather Culture
"Leather" is a blanket term for a large array of sexual preferences, identities, relationship structures, and social organizations loosely tied together by the thread of what is conventionally understood as sadomasochistic sex.
Anthony, Susan B. Anthony, Susan B.
Although best known for her crusade for women's suffrage, Susan B. Anthony spoke out on a range of feminist issues.
Africa: Sub-Saharan, Pre-Independence
With reports from hundreds of sub-Saharan African locales of male-male sexual relations and from about fifty of female-female sexual relations, it is clear that same-sex sexual relations existed in traditional African societies, though varying in forms and in the degree of public acceptance
Androgyny Androgyny
Androgyny, a psychological blending of gender traits, has long been embraced by strong women, soft men, members of queer communities, and others who do not easily fit into traditionally defined gender categories.
A cultural crossroads between Asia and Europe, Russia has a long, rich, and often violent heritage of varied influences and stark confrontations in regard to its patterns of same-sex love.
Topics In the News
Federal Judge Invalidates Texas Marriage Ban
Posted by: Claude J. Summers on 02/26/14
Last updated on: 02/27/14
Bookmark and Share

Plaintiffs Cleopatra De Leon and Nicole Dimetman.

On February 26, 2014, U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia of San Antonio declared Texas's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. He ruled that it violates due process and equal protection under the law by stigmatizing the relationships of same-sex couples and treating them differently under the law.

As Robert T. Garrett reports in the Dallas Morning News, Judge Garcia stayed his ruling pending appeal to the conservative Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

"Today's court decision is not made in defiance of the great people of Texas or the Texas Legislature, but in compliance with the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court precedent," Garcia said in his decision. "Without a rational relation to a legitimate governmental purpose, state-imposed inequality can find no refuge in our U.S. Constitution."

Garcia's decision comes in De Leon v. Perry, one of three cases challenging Texas's marriage ban. It was brought by two men from Plano, Mark Phariss and Victor Holmes, who have been a couple for 16 years and want to marry; and by a lesbian couple, Cleopatra De Leon and Nicole Dimetman, who were married in Massachusetts nine years ago and want Texas to recognize their marriage. De Leon and Dimetman are rearing a child.

In reaching the conclusion that Texas's laws that exclude same-sex couples from marriage are unconstitutional, Judge Garcia found that they fail to survive even the most lenient level of scrutiny, rational review (though, intriguingly, he found the plaintiffs' argument that the laws should be subjected to heightened scrutiny "compelling").

He dismissed the state's argument that the marriage ban is related to the state's interest in childrearing, pointing out not only that the state offered no real evidence for the contention that excluding same-sex couples from marriage positively affects childrearing, but also that preventing same-sex couples from marrying denies their children the protection and stability the state claims is so important.

He similarly rejected the state's argument that excluding gay couples from marriage encourages heterosexual procreation, observing that procreation is not and has never been a qualification for marriage. He notes that individuals who cannot or will not procreate are allowed to marry under current Texas law.

In reaching his decision, Judge Garcia methodically traced how the Supreme Court rulings in Romer v. Evans (1996), Lawrence v. Texas (2003), and Windsor v. U.S.A. (2014) made his conclusion inevitable.

In addition, Judge Garcia explained clearly how same-sex couples suffer as a result of their exclusion from marriage.

Judge Garcia's decision may be found here.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott and Governor Rick Perry said that the state will appeal the decision to the Fifth Circuit and, if necessary, to the Supreme Court of the United States.

The Texas case, along with similar ones from Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Oklahoma, Virginia, and Kentucky, will soon be reviewed by Appellate Courts. Other state bans are under challenge throughout the country, including Michigan, where a trial is currently underway. It is widely believed that the Supreme Court will decide to review at least one of these cases in the near future.

In the video below, plaintiffs Cleopatra De Leon and Nicole Dimetman explain why they want their marriage recognized in Texas.

The video below features plaintiffs Mark Phariss and Victor Holmes.

Both couples appear in this report on the February 26 ruling by San Antonio television staion KENS.

Related Encyclopedia Entries
browse:   arts   literature   social-sciences   discussion boards
learn more about glbtq       contact us       advertise on glbtq.com
Bookmark and Share

glbtq™ and its logo are trademarks of glbtq, Inc.
This site and its contents Copyright © 2002-2015, glbtq, Inc.

Your use of this site indicates that you accept its Terms of Service.