social sciences
special features
about glbtq

Advertising Opportunities
Press Kit
Research Guide
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
site guide
search tips
research guide
editors & contributors
contact us
send feedback
write the editor
Subscribe to our free e-mail newsletter to receive a spotlight on glbtq culture every month.
e-mail address:
Popular Topics in Social Sciences
Stonewall Riots Stonewall Riots
The confrontations between police and demonstrators at the Stonewall Inn in New York City the weekend of June 27-29, 1969 mark the beginning of the modern glbtq movement for equal rights.
Gay Liberation Front
Formed soon after the Stonewall Riots of 1969, the short-lived but influential Gay Liberation Front brought a new militancy to the movement that became known as gay liberation.
The Sexual Revolution, 1960-1980 The Sexual Revolution, 1960-1980
The sexual revolution of post-World War II America changed sexual and gender roles profoundly.
Leather Culture
"Leather" is a blanket term for a large array of sexual preferences, identities, relationship structures, and social organizations loosely tied together by the thread of what is conventionally understood as sadomasochistic sex.
Anthony, Susan B. Anthony, Susan B.
Although best known for her crusade for women's suffrage, Susan B. Anthony spoke out on a range of feminist issues.
Africa: Sub-Saharan, Pre-Independence
With reports from hundreds of sub-Saharan African locales of male-male sexual relations and from about fifty of female-female sexual relations, it is clear that same-sex sexual relations existed in traditional African societies, though varying in forms and in the degree of public acceptance
Androgyny Androgyny
Androgyny, a psychological blending of gender traits, has long been embraced by strong women, soft men, members of queer communities, and others who do not easily fit into traditionally defined gender categories.
A cultural crossroads between Asia and Europe, Russia has a long, rich, and often violent heritage of varied influences and stark confrontations in regard to its patterns of same-sex love.
Topics In the News
President Obama Opposes Anti-Gay Marriage Amendments
Posted by: Claude J. Summers on 04/09/12
Last updated on: 04/09/12
Bookmark and Share

Campaign Manager Matt McTighe of Mainers United for Marriage.

On April 9, 2012, President Obama's campaign in Minnesota announced that the campaign will oppose the state's proposed constitutional amendment to define marriage as between one man and one woman. The amendment will appear on the November 2012 ballot. The administration had earlier announced that the President opposes a similar amendment that is slated for North Carolina's May 8, 2012 ballot.

The statement issued by the President's Minnesota campaign is identical to the one issued in reference to the North Carolina proposed amendment: "While the President does not weigh in on every single ballot measure in every state, the record is clear that the President has long opposed divisive and discriminatory efforts to deny rights and benefits to same sex couples."

Indeed, in 2008 candidate Barack Obama issued a statement opposing California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage in the golden state, but--due to a colossal error of judgment that rose to the level of gross incompetence--the statement was not used by the No on Proposition 8 campaign.

In addition to the constitutional amendments on the ballots in North Carolina and Minnesota, there will almost certainly be efforts to repeal the recently passed marriage equality laws in Washington and Maryland. In Maine, there will a referendum that, if passed, will create marriage equality in the state.

Prospects of passing the marriage equality amendment in Maine are looking good. Recent polls show a majority of Mainers in favor of marriage equality, and Maine's advocacy group, EqualityMaine, is well organized and experienced, having fought several ballot issues over the years.

Because the Maine amendment is proactive, it is especially important: it marks the first time that gay rights groups have originated a referendum in favor of marriage equality. Passage of the initiative would send a powerful message. It would mean that just 3 years ago after vetoing a marriage equality law that had been enacted by the legislature, Mainers decided to adopt it by popular vote.

It is thought that Washington voters are likely to approve the marriage equality there if it is subjected to a referendum. After all, Washington voters rejected the 2009 attempt to veto the state's all-but-marriage domestic partnership law.

Prospects for success in Minnesota, Maryland, and North Carolina are more difficult to measure.

Recent polls have shown the anti-gay amendment in Minnesota slightly ahead, but Minnesota has a tradition of liberalism on social issues, and the statement in opposition to the amendment by President Obama, who is popular in the state, will certainly help. It is expected that the state's Democratic establishment will actively oppose the amendment.

The latest polls in Maryland have indicated that those opposed to the recently passed marriage equality law currently hold a small lead. If President Obama campaigns against the referendum to repeal the marriage equality law in Maryland, however, that will help greatly, perhaps especially with the state's large African-American population, which seems now to oppose the law by a double-digit margin.

David Mixner, writing in his "Live from Hell's Kitchen" blog, emphasizes why Maryland may be difficult to win and why it is important that we do win.

Not to compete in Maryland would betray the Democratic establishment we pressured to pass the marriage equality bill and it would forfeit an opportunity to win over the African-American community, who should be our allies.

Perhaps the most problematic state is North Carolina. Amendment One would prohibit not only same-sex marriage but also recognition of civil unions and domestic partnerships for both same-sex and opposite-sex couples. Polls in the state have yielded perplexing results. Some have shown 60% of the voters in favor of Amendment One, even though other polls have shown that almost 60% of the residents of the state are in favor of either marriage equality or civil unions for same-sex couples.

Although most prognosticators early wrote off the prospects for a gay rights victory in North Carolina, some have become convinced that it is possible to defeat Amendment One.

The best case for victory in North Carolina has been made by Adam Bink of the Courage Campaign. In an op-ed published in The Advocate, Bink points out that there are good reasons to believe that--with sufficient education--Amendment One can be defeated.

Bink concludes his op-ed by declaring, "I'll take the wager that the most progressive southern state of them all has come a long way on this issue and is poised to come even further May 8--if we suspend our belief that Amendment One will pass just because conventional wisdom says it will. We've seen bigger political upsets, and with just a few weeks to go until May 8, our movement is poised to see another one."

It goes without saying that all the campaigns for equal rights need money and volunteers. Perhaps the most urgent need is for the campaign in North Carolina. Contributions may be made to the Coalition to Protect All North Carolina Families here.

In the video below, Matt McTighe, the newly-appointed campaign manager for Mainers United, asks, "Will You Answer the Call?"

Related Encyclopedia Entries
browse:   arts   literature   social-sciences   discussion boards
learn more about glbtq       contact us       advertise on glbtq.com
Bookmark and Share

glbtq™ and its logo are trademarks of glbtq, Inc.
This site and its contents Copyright © 2002-2015, glbtq, Inc.

Your use of this site indicates that you accept its Terms of Service.