social sciences
special features
about glbtq

Advertising Opportunities
Press Kit
Research Guide
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
site guide
search tips
research guide
editors & contributors
contact us
send feedback
write the editor
Subscribe to our free e-mail newsletter to receive a spotlight on glbtq culture every month.
e-mail address:
Popular Topics in Social Sciences
Stonewall Riots Stonewall Riots
The confrontations between police and demonstrators at the Stonewall Inn in New York City the weekend of June 27-29, 1969 mark the beginning of the modern glbtq movement for equal rights.
Gay Liberation Front
Formed soon after the Stonewall Riots of 1969, the short-lived but influential Gay Liberation Front brought a new militancy to the movement that became known as gay liberation.
The Sexual Revolution, 1960-1980 The Sexual Revolution, 1960-1980
The sexual revolution of post-World War II America changed sexual and gender roles profoundly.
Leather Culture
"Leather" is a blanket term for a large array of sexual preferences, identities, relationship structures, and social organizations loosely tied together by the thread of what is conventionally understood as sadomasochistic sex.
Anthony, Susan B. Anthony, Susan B.
Although best known for her crusade for women's suffrage, Susan B. Anthony spoke out on a range of feminist issues.
Africa: Sub-Saharan, Pre-Independence
With reports from hundreds of sub-Saharan African locales of male-male sexual relations and from about fifty of female-female sexual relations, it is clear that same-sex sexual relations existed in traditional African societies, though varying in forms and in the degree of public acceptance
Androgyny Androgyny
Androgyny, a psychological blending of gender traits, has long been embraced by strong women, soft men, members of queer communities, and others who do not easily fit into traditionally defined gender categories.
A cultural crossroads between Asia and Europe, Russia has a long, rich, and often violent heritage of varied influences and stark confrontations in regard to its patterns of same-sex love.
Topics In the News
Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Hears Oklahoma Marriage Case
Posted by: Claude J. Summers on 04/17/14
Last updated on: 04/17/14
Bookmark and Share

On April 17, 2014, the same three-judge panel of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals that heard the Utah marriage equality case a week ago convened in Denver to hear the Oklahoma marriage equality case. As they had in the Utah case, the panel, consisting of Judges Carlos Lucero, Jerome A. Holmes, and Paul J. Kelly Jr., again appeared divided in sympathy as they considered the case of Bishop v. Smith.

On January 14, 2014, U.S. District Judge Terence Kern declared that Oklahoma's constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage violates the equal protection guarantee of the U.S. Constitution. After concluding that the ban on same-sex marriage was motivated by impermissible "moral disapproval" of homosexuality and furthers no legitimate state interest, Judge Kern declared it unconstitutional and then stayed his ruling pending a review by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Bishop case was originally filed by Mary Bishop and Sharon Baldwin almost ten years ago. It was delayed by conflicting decisions as to questions of standing, but got new life after the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Windsor on June 26, 2013.

Bishop and Baldwin have been a couple for 17 years. They both work as editors at The Tulsa World.

In the hearing on April 17, Judges Holmes and Lucero seemed clearly supportive of the plaintiffs' contention that Oklahoma's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional. Judge Holmes pointedly observed that states cannot define marriage in a way that tramples constitutional rights.

In contrast, Judge Kelly seemed dubious as to whether the plaintiffs had standing to sue and whether they were suing the right state official.

Judge Lucero expressed concern for the children of same-sex parents and appeared skeptical of the arguments presented by the state that allowing a same-sex couple to marry would have an adverse affect on opposite-sex couples. At one point he characterized Oklahoma's argument as saying that "if gay marriage is allowed, that somehow that's going to be a poison pill to marriage by heterosexual couples[.]"

Judge Holmes seemed skeptical of the amicus briefs suggesting that same-sex couples were not ideal parents and pointed instead to brief submitted by the American Sociological Association, which said that research shows that there's "no difference" in same-sex and opposite-sex parenting.

An audio tape of the hearing may be found here.

Related Encyclopedia Entries
browse:   arts   literature   social-sciences   discussion boards
learn more about glbtq       contact us       advertise on glbtq.com
Bookmark and Share

glbtq™ and its logo are trademarks of glbtq, Inc.
This site and its contents Copyright © 2002-2015, glbtq, Inc.

Your use of this site indicates that you accept its Terms of Service.