|
|
|
|
Advertising Opportunities Permissions & Licensing Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright
|
|
||||||||||||
| Patristic Writers
What remains distinctive about the Judeo-Christian appropriation of these precepts is that what began as philosophical counsels of moderation, temperance, and self-control have been transformed into commandments of the biblical God. A New Commandment and a New Vocabulary The fathers gave added weight to the Levitical and Pauline prohibitions in two more original ways: by adding a prohibition of pederasty to the Ten Commandments (the sixth: "Thou shalt not commit adultery") and by coining terminologies in Greek and Latin designed to inscribe in the language itself Christian hostility to the same-sex acts already judged abominable in the Holiness Code (Leviticus 17-26). The Constitution of the Apostles, a collection of ecclesiastical law compiled in the late fourth century, but containing earlier material, records the expansion of the sixth commandment like this: "Do not commit adultery: for you divide one flesh into two: For . . . husband and wife are one by nature, concord, union, affection, life, and habit, and separated only by sex and number. Do not abuse boys (oude paidophthoréseis): for this vice is against nature and had its beginning in Sodom, a city consumed by fire sent down from Heaven. Let such a man be cursed and the whole people say: So be it, so be it." The Greek neologisms are compounds of pais (boy) and phthora (abuse, corruption): the noun paidophthoros, the verb paidophthoreo, and the class noun paidophthoria. Paidophthoros, like Paul's arsenokoitai, was probably coined by Hellenized Jews. The word does not appear in either the Septuagint or the New Testament. Christians adopted it in the second century. Neither it nor its relatives appear in the literature of the Gentiles. To be sure, pagan moralists and legists had strong views of their own about honor and shame, consent and coercion, and they had words like hubris and stuprum, each capable of registering a wide range of disapproval with which to reprobate sexual behaviors they considered illicit: for example, any effort to coerce or buy a freeborn boy, the seduction of boys too young to be legitimate players on the sexual scene, or the failure of an adult lover to protect with tact the masculinity of his adolescent boyfriend. The innovation of the early fathers of the church was to make the crucial move of labeling pederasty itself an abuse. So Greek Christians learned to say "boy-abuse" (paidophthoria) instead of "boy-love" (paiderastia), "abuser of boys" (paidophthoros) instead of "lover of boys" (paederastés, paidophilos), and "to abuse boys" (paidophthoreo) rather than to love them (paidophilein). The Myth of Sodom The same ideological climate caused Christians to accept without challenge the homosexual interpretation of the Sodom story that Philo had taught Greek-speaking Jews. By the end of the fourth century, the Latin fathers had fixed permanently in the folklore of the West the links between male-male sex, the lewdness of Sodom, God's anger, and the city's incendiary punishment. The male inhabitants of Sodom wrote St. Augustine (354-430), "burned with unspeakable lust for one another." Their offense was "abusive intercourse with males" (stuprum in masculos), and God punished them by raining fire from heaven on their sinful heads, a foretaste of the divine punishment to come. The crimes of the Sodomites are against nature (contra naturam) and must be everywhere and always hated and punished. The relationship we ought to have with God is violated when the nature of which He is the author is polluted by perverted desire. Augustine's influential disciple, the historian Orosius, stressed that the crime of the Sodomites was precisely their choice of male sexual partners. Sodom and Gomorrah were rich. From abundance sprang luxury, and from luxury, sexual depravity, "males with males working shame" (masculi in masculos operantes turpitudinem, Romans 1:27), indifferent in their lust to any consideration of place (public or private), condition (free or slave, rich or poor), or age (adolescent or adult). The homosexualization and acceptance of the Sodom story spawned a new sexual vocabulary in the Latin West, corresponding in meaning and intent with the paidophthoros family in the Greek East. The noun "" (sodomita), the adjective "sodomitical" (sodomiticus), the verbal phrase "to fornicate in the manner of a Sodomite" (more sodomitico) began to circulate in late antiquity. Their frequent attestation in the sixth century signals the beginning of a new period in the history of homosexual nomenclature. From a queer perspective, the most important legacy of the Christian fathers to the modern West is the unconditional condemnation of all non-procreative acts as unnatural, immoral, and unlawful. The corollary is also true: in sexual contexts, "unnatural" and "against nature" come to mean "without procreative potential."
|
|
||||||||||||
literature >> Overview: The Bible social sciences >> Overview: Natural Law social sciences >> Overview: Roman Catholicism social sciences >> Overview: Sodom social sciences >> Overview: Sodomy literature >> Augustine of Hippo social sciences >> Paul, St. literature >> Plato
|
|||||||||||||
| Bibliography | ||
Bailey, D.S. Homosexuality and the Western Christian Tradition. London: Longmans, 1955. Boswell, John. Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality: Gay People in Western Europe from the Beginning of the Christian Era to the Fourteenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. Brooten, Bernadette J. Love Between Women: Early Christian Responses to Female Homoeroticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. Brown, Peter. The Body and Society: Men, Women, and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988. Fox, Robin Lane. Pagans and Christians in the Mediterranean World from the Second Century A.D. to the Conversion of Constantine. London: Penguin, 1986. Gaca, Kathy L. The Making of Fornication: Eros, Ethics, and Political Reform in Greek Philosophy and Early Christianity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. Guthrie, Kenneth Sylvan. The Pythagorean Sourcebook and Library: An Anthology of Ancient Writings which Relate to Phythagoras and Pythagorean Philosophy. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Phanes Press, 1987. Kueffler, Mathew. The Manly Eunuch. Masculinity, Gender Ambiguity, and Christian Ideology in Late Antiquity. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2001. Riedweg, Christoph. Pythagoras: His Life, Teaching, and Influence. Steven Rendall, trans. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2005. Thesleef, Holger. The Pythagorean Texts of the Hellenistic Period. Abo: Abo Akademi, 1965. Ward, Ray Bowen. "Why Unnatural? The Tradition behind Romans 1:26-27." Harvard Theological Review 90 (1997): 263-84.
|
| Citation Information | ||||
| Author: | Rice, Eugene | |||
| Entry Title: | Patristic Writers | |||
| General Editor: | Claude J. Summers | |||
| Publication Name: | glbtq: An Encyclopedia of Gay, Lesbian,
Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Culture |
|||
| Publication Date: | 2006 | |||
| Date Last Updated | December 13, 2006 | |||
| Web Address | www.glbtq.com/literature/patristic_writers_lit.html | |||
| Publisher | glbtq, Inc. 1130 West Adams Chicago, IL 60607 |
|||
| Today's Date | ||||
| Encyclopedia Copyright: | © 2002-2006, glbtq, Inc. | |||
| Entry Copyright | © 2004, 2006, glbtq, Inc. | |||
|
This Entry Copyright © 2004, 2006, glbtq, Inc. www.glbtq.com
is produced by glbtq, Inc., 1130 West Adams Street, Chicago, IL
60607 glbtq™ and its logo are trademarks of glbtq, Inc. |