glbtq: an encyclopedia of gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender & queer culture
home
arts
literature
social sciences
special features
discussion
about glbtq
   search

 
   Encyclopedia
   Discussion
 
 

   member name
  
   password
  
 
   
   Forgot Your Password?  
   
Not a Member Yet?  
   
JOIN TODAY. IT'S FREE!

 
  Advertising Opportunities
  Permissions & Licensing
  Terms of Service
  Privacy Policy
  Copyright

 

 

 

 

 
social sciences

Alpha Index:  A-B  C-F  G-K  L-Q  R-S  T-Z

Subjects:  A-E  F-L  M-Z

     
Census 2000  
 
page: 1  2  

Estimates of the size of the undercount vary. Gates and Ost suggest that the true size of the coupled gay and lesbian population is likely 25 percent higher than Census 2000 figures and could be as much as 50 percent higher.

Other Difficulties with Census Counts of Same-sex Unmarried Partners

While the existence of an undercount is quite likely, an equally relevant issue is the possibility that some portion of the same-sex unmarried partner couples might be incorrectly designated as such due to a miscoding of either the "unmarried partner" relationship status or the sex of one of the partners. There are a number of ways a household could be classified in the census data as a same-sex unmarried partner household even though it is not headed by a gay male or lesbian couple.

Sponsor Message.

One source of measurement error among the same-sex unmarried partner data from Census 2000 is likely a result of sex miscoding errors among heterosexual couples. It can be assumed that some very small fraction of the population makes an error when completing the census form and possibly miscodes a variety of responses, including the sex of the householder or the householder's "husband/wife" or "unmarried partner." Under Census 2000 editing procedures, all these miscoded couples would be included in the counts of same-sex unmarried partners.

Because the ratio between married couples and same-sex couples is so large (roughly 90 to 1), even a small fraction of sex miscoding among married couples adds a sizable fraction of heterosexual married couples to the same-sex unmarried-partner population, possibly distorting some demographic characteristics, particularly child rearing.

Mistakes in the designation of an unmarried partner could also cause errors. One form of error occurs when the person filling out the census form (the householder) does not have a spouse or unmarried partner in the household, but does have a child or other adult in the household living with an unmarried partner. For example, if a female householder classifies the female unmarried partner of her son as an "unmarried partner," then this household would be counted as a female same-sex unmarried partner, or lesbian, household.

While analysis of 1990 Census data suggests that this type of error has negligible effects on the quality of the data at a national level, it could be more common in analyses of certain communities where extended families are more likely to be living in the home, and households are larger. For example, Hispanic and Native American populations are more likely to have extended families living in the home. Communities with large Hispanic and Native American populations are therefore more susceptible to this type of error because there are proportionally more households where the error could occur.

Another form of measurement error could be language-based. Confusion may result when respondents fill out a census form not written in their native language or if the census enumerator translations of terms such as "unmarried partner" and "roommate" in other languages, particularly Spanish, do not have the same meanings as the English version. All households in the 50 states and the District of Columbia received English language forms, regardless of the predominant language spoken in either the household or the neighborhood. However, if a census form was not returned, most likely an enumerator who speaks local native languages would have visited the house and assisted the householder in filling out an English-language form.

Who Counts in the Census?

Many members of the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and community were left out of the census. The largest omission is single gay men and lesbians, who form a majority of the glbtq community. Likely more than half of all gay and lesbian individuals in the United States are not included in census data counting only same-sex couples. Bisexual and transgender individuals will sporadically appear in the data, but cannot be identified as such since there was no census question about sexual orientation or gender identity.

Conclusion

Despite these problems of undercounting and measurement errors, Census 2000 data on same-sex partners represent the most comprehensive source of data on gay and lesbian couples living in the United States. Lobbyists from gay/lesbian civil rights groups regularly use this information to attempt to convince congressional representatives that gay and lesbian people live, and most likely vote, in their districts. The Congressional Budget Office recently used the figures to assess the fiscal impact of same-sex marriage on the U.S. budget.

These data provide the first empirical evidence that gay and lesbian people live virtually everywhere in the United States and help to dispel stereotypes by presenting a more accurate picture of gay and lesbian families.

Gary J. Gates

  <previous page   page: 1  2    

    
 interact  
   
Contact Us
 
Join the Discussion
 
 find 
   
Related Entries
 
More Entries by this contributor
 
A Bibliography on this Topic

 
Citation Information
 
More Entries about Social Sciences
 
 


   Related Entries
  
social sciences >> Overview:  Children of GLBTQ Parents

Over three decades of research has repeatedly shown that children of glbtq parents are no different from their peers reared in heterosexual families; recently queerspawn themselves have added their own voices to the discourse.

social sciences >> Overview:  Civil Union

Vermont's Civil Union law conferred all the rights, benefits, and responsibilities of marriage on same-sex couples.

social sciences >> Overview:  Demographics

Recent surveys and data collection efforts hold the promise of providing a more accurate demographic picture of the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender community.

social sciences >> Overview:  Domestic Partnerships

"Domestic partnership" is the generic term for a variety of forms of legal and institutional recognition of same-sex couples that fall short of same-sex marriage.

social sciences >> Overview:  Family

Many glbtq people reject a fixed definition of family imposed by society, and instead claim the right to define their own families as they choose.

social sciences >> Overview:  Market Research

Over the past decade, the field of market research has developed a more complete snapshot of a highly diverse population of glbtq consumers by using newer scientific methodologies.

social sciences >> Overview:  Parenting

Even though glbtq people have been parents throughout history, recent political movements and advances in fertility technology have given rise to a much more visible and self-identified gay and lesbian parents.

social sciences >> Overview:  Rural Life

Rural life offers both challenges and satisfactions for glbtq people.

social sciences >> Overview:  Same-Sex Marriage

Lesbian and gay couples have been fighting for the freedom to marry since the dawn of the modern glbtq struggle for equality; despite some success abroad, progress toward same-sex marriage in the United States has been slow.


    Bibliography
   

Badgett, M.V. Lee, and Marc A. Rogers. "Left Out of the Count: Missing Same-sex Couples in Census 2000." Amherst, Mass.: Institute for Gay and Lesbian Strategic Studies (IGLSS), 2003.

Black, Dan, Gary J. Gates, Seth G. Sanders, and Lowell Taylor. "Demographics of the Gay and Lesbian Population in the United States: Evidence from Available Systematic Data Sources." Demography 37.2 (2000): 139-54.

Gates, Gary J., and Jason Ost. The Gay & Lesbian Atlas. Washington: Urban Institute Press, 2004.

Laumann, Edward O., John H. Gagnon, and Robert T. Michael. The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

U.S. Census Bureau. "Census 2000 Basics." Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

 

    Citation Information
         
    Author: Gates, Gary J.  
    Entry Title: Census 2000  
    General Editor: Claude J. Summers  
    Publication Name: glbtq: An Encyclopedia of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual,
Transgender, and Queer Culture
 
    Publication Date: 2004  
    Date Last Updated February 3, 2005  
    Web Address www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/census_2000.html  
    Publisher glbtq, Inc.
1130 West Adams
Chicago, IL   60607
 
    Today's Date  
    Encyclopedia Copyright: © 2002-2006, glbtq, Inc.  
    Entry Copyright © 2004, glbtq, inc.  
 

 

This Entry Copyright © 2004, glbtq, inc.

www.glbtq.com is produced by glbtq, Inc., 1130 West Adams Street, Chicago, IL   60607 glbtq™ and its logo are trademarks of glbtq, Inc.
This site and its contents Copyright © 2002-2006, glbtq, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
Your use of this site indicates that you accept its Terms of Service.