|
|
|
|
Advertising Opportunities Permissions & Licensing Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright
|
|
||||||||||||
| Custody Litigation
Jones v. Boring involved Patricia Jones and Ellen Boring, who were partners for 14 years. They planned a family together and both became caregivers to their twins. After the couple separated in 2001, a Pennsylvania court found that Jones had parental rights to the children and awarded joint custody to both mothers, with primary physical custody going to Boring, the biological parent. Later, Jones filed for primary physical custody, citing Boring's history of contempt in observing the visitation schedule set by the court. The court found "convincing reasons" that being in Jones's custody would be in the best interest of the children and awarded her primary physical custody. Boring appealed the decision, contending that as the children's biological mother she could not have her children removed from her custody unless a court found her unfit. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania rejected Boring's argument and upheld the lower court's decision to grant primary physical custody to Jones. In a historic settlement reached in Florida in 2005, a state judge granted child custody to Michael Kantaras, a stepfather in a bitter divorce case, ruling that the stepfather was legally male under Florida law, although he had been born female. The ruling, the first of its kind in the state, affirmed that Kantaras was the legal parent of his former wife's teenage son, whom he had adopted, and a daughter she conceived through artificial insemination during their marriage. The court determined that Kantaras was the better, more fit parent and that his ex-wife had tried to turn the children against him. The ruling was hailed by national gay and lesbian advocacy groups as a landmark decision in favor of transsexuals, particularly in a state that had banned same-sex marriages and barred homosexuals from adopting children. Adoption, Artificial Insemination, and Surrogacy Issues Some of the most difficult legal questions involving custody issues pivot on the legal status of glbtq partners who choose to have children through adoption, artificial insemination, or surrogacy. When a same-sex couple decides to rear a child together, in most states only one of them can legally adopt. In such circumstances, the nonadoptive parent is not considered a legal parent. Only by completing a joint or second-parent adoption can the parental rights of the other parent be protected, and only a minority of states allow joint adoption by glbtq couples. Second parent adoption (also known as Co-Parent Adoption) is a legal procedure that allows one partner of a same-sex couple to adopt the other partner's biological or adopted children without terminating the first parent's rights as a parent. Second parent adoptions give the child two legal guardians. It protects both parents by giving both of them legally recognized parental status. Second parent adoptions often take place when a lesbian has a child through artificial insemination and her lesbian partner adopts the child as her own also. It is also sometimes used when a gay male couple has a child with the aid of a surrogate mother; although only one of the partners is the biological father of the child, both partners are legal parents. Many couples who conceive children through artificial conception or surrogacy sign written agreements with the donors and surrogates concerning their child-rearing intentions, often limiting the donor's or surrogate's role in parenting the children. Many courts, however, have ruled that these agreements are unenforceable. In most states, courts have been unwilling to deny parental rights to known sperm donors even when they have agreed to relinquish such rights before conception. As a result of the legalization of same-sex marriage in Massachusetts and Canada, and the adoption of Civil Unions in such states as Vermont and New Jersey, same-sex spouses in those jurisdictions are able to have both their names included on the birth certificates of children adopted or conceived by artificial insemination or surrogacy. Resources A number of activist legal and political organizations deserve credit for the progress that has been made in securing a fair hearing for glbtq parents in custody litigation. The National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR) has been focusing on family and parenting law for over 30 years. Among the catalysts for its founding (as the Lesbian Rights Project) in 1977 was to assist lesbians who were losing custody of their children. They subsequently have led in the quest for joint adoptions. In the beginning of 2007, NCLR launched the Family Protection Project, which works to improve access to family law services for low-income same-sex parent families, with a focus on serving families of color. New England-based Gay and Lesbian Advocates (GLAD) has also been a pioneer in ensuring equal rights for glbtq parents and families. Thanks to its advocacy, most of the New England states recognize de facto parents or permit joint adoptions or joint guardianship by glbtq couples. Since the 1980s, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund has also focused on family law and same-sex marriage. Recently, they successfully challenged an Oklahoma law so extreme that it left children adopted by same-sex couples in other states orphans in the eyes of the law when their families moved to or traveled through Oklahoma. Conclusion Though much progress has been made throughout the country on child custody and visitation rights for gay and lesbian parents, many courts continue to deny completely a parent's rights or restrict a parent from exercising those rights in the presence of a same-sex partner. Yet, research shows that glbtq mothers and fathers have high parenting skills and that their sexual orientation has no negative impact on their children. In fact, studies demonstrate that children of lesbian and gay parents generally have positive relationships with their peers and that their relationships with adults of both sexes are also satisfactory.
|
|
||||||||||||
social sciences >> Overview: Adoption social sciences >> Overview: Artificial Insemination social sciences >> Overview: Census 2000 social sciences >> Overview: Children of GLBTQ Parents social sciences >> Overview: Civil Union social sciences >> Overview: Parenting social sciences >> Overview: Same-Sex Marriage social sciences >> Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD)
|
|||||||||||||
| Bibliography | ||
Bowe, John. "Gay Donor or Gay Dad?" The New York Times Magazine (November 19, 2006): http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/19/magazine/19fathering.html?_r=1&oref=slogin Egelko, Bob. "Court Grants Equal Rights to Same-sex Parents." San Francisco Chronicle (August 23, 2005): http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/08/23/MNG66EBQ611.DTL Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD): www.glad.org Hawkins, Asher. "Justices Let Stand Grant of Custody to Nonbiological Lesbian Mother." The Legal Intelligencer (December 1, 2006): find.galegroup.com/itx/start.do?proId=ITOF Lambda Legal: www.lambdalegal.org National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR): www.nclrights.org Polikoff, Nancy D. "Custody Litigation." Lesbian Histories and Cultures: An Encyclopedia. Bonnie Zimmerman, ed. New York: Garland, 2000. 218-220. _____. "Raising Children: Lesbian and Gay Parents Face the Public and the Courts." Creating Change: Sexuality, Public Policy, and Civil Rights. John D'Emilio, William B. Turner, and Urvashi Vaid, eds. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000.
|
| Citation Information | ||||
| Author: | Kaczorowski, Craig | |||
| Entry Title: | Custody Litigation | |||
| General Editor: | Claude J. Summers | |||
| Publication Name: | glbtq: An Encyclopedia of Gay, Lesbian,
Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Culture |
|||
| Publication Date: | 2007 | |||
| Date Last Updated | November 29, 2007 | |||
| Web Address | www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/custody_litigation.html | |||
| Publisher | glbtq, Inc. 1130 West Adams Chicago, IL 60607 |
|||
| Today's Date | ||||
| Encyclopedia Copyright: | © 2002-2006, glbtq, Inc. | |||
| Entry Copyright | © 2007 glbtq, Inc. | |||
|
This Entry Copyright © 2007 glbtq, Inc. www.glbtq.com
is produced by glbtq, Inc., 1130 West Adams Street, Chicago, IL
60607 glbtq™ and its logo are trademarks of glbtq, Inc. |