|
|
|
|
Advertising Opportunities Permissions & Licensing Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright
|
|
|||||||||||
| India
The third-natured person in the Kama Sutra is described as performing oral sex, but not anal sex. It is noted that anal intercourse was practiced in South India (Kama Sutra 2.6.49), but the anus is considered the "bad route" in the commentary of Yashodhara, written approximately eight-hundred years later (2.6.49). While Yashodhara considers anal intercourse to be a perversion of Southern origin, he notes that oral sex with a third-natured person is not a form of "special copulation" (2.6.49). With respect to male-male kama (desire), an active/passive dichotomy is apparent in the historical record as well as in present day thought. The male passive partner takes the receptive role in sex, and is more stigmatized. There is less stigmatization of an active partner in such a relationship, and in modern India the passive partner in male-male sex is called by different terms than an active participant. The Muslim Conquest of India Many aspects of Indian life, including sexuality, were changed by the Muslim conquest of South Asia that began in the eighth century. Islamic rule spread into modern-day India in the early eleventh century and culminated with the tenuous conquest of most of South India in 1707. The introduction of Islam had a more profound effect on North India, which was held mostly under Muslim rule until the nineteenth century. While anal intercourse between men is forbidden in the Quran (4.15), the punishments prescribed are less severe than those in the Old Testament. Male-male desire is not taboo; however, acting upon such desire is prohibited. It is also worth noting that Islam is not a uniform religion, and a liberal form of Sufism in India called for contemplation of God's bounty through pleasure. Indo-Islamic poetry suggests that men had sex with one another despite prohibitions, and there were only slight attempts to curb this activity. One poem is particularly revealing: "He is the king in Delhi who lies under the lover" (trans. Rahman). Indo-Islamic love poetry is usually written from the point of view of the older, sexually active (penetrating) male, but often indicates that the younger man in such a relationship held the power of rejection and was perhaps not as passive as his denoted sexual role might otherwise indicate. Less is known about female-female sexuality in Muslim India, though some illustrations and poetry are illuminating. European Colonialism European colonialism began with the Portuguese, ca 1500, and culminated with direct British rule of India in 1857. Not only did the British introduce anti-sodomy legislation, but Judeo-Christian social attitudes towards homoeroticism and gender variance as well. Women who dressed in men's clothing and served as bodyguards and porters were noticed by English colonials prior to 1857, but disappeared with the decline of Indian court life. Male-male homoerotic poetry ceased to be published. Although some poetry discussing love between women, called rekhti, continued to be written in the late nineteenth century, it was eventually suppressed as well. India Today Today, homosexual behavior in India consists primarily of acts performed with great discretion, with the partners usually adopting rigid sexual roles. Open, Western-style gayness is not something that has taken root in India, outside a few large cities. The family is still the source of economic security, and many men and women who engage in homoerotic acts also marry because of parental pressure, economic necessity, and the need for children to provide geriatric care. As a result, exclusive same-sex relationships are rare in India. The lack of a public social security system, poverty, and compulsory heterosexual marriage may indeed be the most oppressive aspects of everyday life in India for individuals who identify as glbtq. Consequently, those who do adopt a Westernized gay, lesbian, or transgendered identity often migrate to large Indian cities or live abroad as part of a larger, worldwide South Asian diaspora. In Bombay, Delhi, and other large cities, a small glbtq culture that includes bars, magazines, organized parties, support groups, and activist organizations (often organized around AIDS issues) has begun to emerge. This phenomenon, in addition to the appearance of gay and lesbian characters in contemporary Indian film and literature, as well as very recent developments in the Indian academy to incorporate Queer Studies, represents the beginnings of a civil rights movement within Indian society. It could be said that those who identify as bisexual or heterosexual have an easier time living in contemporary India than lesbians or gays, but such a statement risks enforcing Western categories in a multicultural, multiethnic country where sex, sexuality, and gender are often understood and lived very differently. Even less categorizing terms--such as men who have sex with men or women who have sex with women--may deny the complexities of reality in India, where active/passive contrasts are still very strong and native terminology generally reflects the nuances of Indian life better than Western identities.
|
|
|||||||||||
arts >> Overview: Asian Film social sciences >> Overview: Hinduism arts >> Overview: Indian Art social sciences >> Overview: Islam literature >> Overview: South Asian Literatures social sciences >> Hijras
|
||||||||||||
| Bibliography | ||
Artola, George. "The Transvestite in Sanskrit Story and Drama." Annals of Oriental Research 25 (1975): 56-68. Bhaskaran, Suparna. "The Politics of Penetration: Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code." Queering India: Same-Sex Love and Eroticism in Indian Culture and Society. Ruth Vanita, ed. New York: Routledge, 2002. 15-29. Cohen, Lawrence. "The Pleasures of Castration: The Postoperative Status of Hijras, Jankhas, and Academics." Sexual Nature, Sexual Culture: Theorizing Sexuality from the Perspective of Pleasure. Paul R. Abrahmson and Steven D. Pinkerton, eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995. 276-304. The Complete Kama Sutra: The First Unabridged Modern Translation of the Classic Indian Text by Vatsyayana, including the Jayamangala Commentary by Yashodhara and extracts from the Hindi Commentary by Devadatta Shastra. Alain Danielou, trans. Rochester, Vt.: Park Street Press, 1994. Hall, Kira. Hijra/Hijran: Language and Gender Identity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley. Ann Arbor, Mich.: UMI, 1995. Jaffrey, Zia. The Invisibles: The Eunuchs of India. New York: Vintage Books, 1996. Keay, John. India: A History. New York: Grove Press, 2000. Mallanaga, Vatsyayana. Kamasutra. Wendy Doniger and Sudhir Kakar, trans. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. Naim, C.M. "The Theme of Homosexual (Pederastic) Love in Pre-Modern Urdu Poetry." Studies in the Urdu Gazal and Prose Fiction. Muhammed Umar Memon, ed. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1979. 120-42. Nanda, Serena. Neither Man nor Woman: the Hijras of India. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1990. Pattanaik, Devdutt. The Man Who Was a Woman and Other Queer Tales from Hindu Lore. New York: Harrington Park Press, 2002. Preston, Laurence W. "A Right to Exist: Eunuchs and the State in Nineteenth-Century India." Modern Asian Studies 21:2 (1987): 371-87. Penrose, Walter. "Hidden in History: Female Homoeroticism and Women of a 'Third Nature' in the South Asian Past." Journal of the History of Sexuality 10:1 (2001): 3-39. _____."Colliding Cultures: Masculinity and Homoeroticism in Mughal and Colonial India." Siting Queer Masculinities 1550-1800. Katherine O'Donnell and Michael O'Rourke, eds. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, forthcoming. Rahman, Tariq. "Boy-love in the Urdu Ghazal." Annual of Urdu Studies 7 (1990): 1-20. Saletore, Rajaram Narayan. Sex in Indian Harem Life. New Delhi: Orient Paperbacks, 1978. _____. Sex Life under Indian Rulers. Delhi: Hind Pocket Books, 1974. Seabrook, Jeremy. Love in a Different Climate. London: Verso, 1999. Sweet, Michael J., and Leonard Zwilling. "The First Medicalization: The Taxonomy and Etiology of Queerness in Classical Indian Medicine." Journal of the History of Sexuality 3:4 (1993): 590-607. Thadani, Giti. Sakhiyani: Lesbian Desire in Ancient and Modern India. London: Cassell, 1996. Vanita, Ruth, ed. Queering India: Same-Sex Love and Eroticism in Indian Culture and Society. New York: Routledge, 2002. ______, and Saleem Kidwai. Same-Sex Love in India: Readings from Literature and History. New York: Routledge, 2000.
|
| Citation Information | ||||
| Author: | Penrose, Jr., Walter D. | |||
| Entry Title: | India | |||
| General Editor: | Claude J. Summers | |||
| Publication Name: | glbtq: An Encyclopedia of Gay, Lesbian,
Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Culture |
|||
| Publication Date: | 2004 | |||
| Date Last Updated | November 24, 2006 | |||
| Web Address | www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/india.html | |||
| Publisher | glbtq, Inc. 1130 West Adams Chicago, IL 60607 |
|||
| Today's Date | ||||
| Encyclopedia Copyright: | © 2002-2006, glbtq, Inc. | |||
| Entry Copyright | © 2004, glbtq, inc. | |||
|
This Entry Copyright © 2004, glbtq, inc. www.glbtq.com
is produced by glbtq, Inc., 1130 West Adams Street, Chicago, IL
60607 glbtq™ and its logo are trademarks of glbtq, Inc. |