|
|
|
|
Advertising Opportunities Permissions & Licensing Terms of Service Privacy Policy Copyright
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Military Law: United States
For example, in 1982, the Department of Defense issued Directive 1332.4, which stated, "Homosexuality is incompatible with military service." This directive elaborated on Article 125 and subsequent policies that each branch had implemented during the 1960s and 1970s. Because personnel policies regarding homosexuality were applied unevenly within each branch and across the branches, the Department of Defense had faced a number of court challenges. The courts responded by stipulating that it must create and enforce a consistent policy. The result was a policy that expressly prohibited both homosexuals and homosexual activity in the military. "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Acivilian law passed by the United States Congress, commonly known as "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," was the most powerful restraint on gay men and lesbians in the military from its passage in 1993 until its repeal in 2011. When it was passed, it continued the long-standing United States military tradition of prohibiting homosexuality, even as it attempted to appear more tolerant. The reality was that as of 2000, the annual number of gay and lesbian discharges rose to roughly 1200, considerably more than was the case before the adoption of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." Even though "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" was the law under which most gay men and lesbians were expelled from the military in the years from 1993 until 2011, the military also used Article 125—the law against sodomy--to justify the policies and procedures that banned gay and lesbian service members. Yet as Margot Canaday concluded in her study of the impact of such laws on policies toward homosexuals, "The notion that sodomy statutes somehow support the ban on homosexual personnel in the military is erroneous." Using three case studies, including the Australian Defense Force, the South African Defense Forces, and the Miami Beach Police Department, she found that these organization successfully lifted bans on homosexual personnel while sodomy laws remained in existence. Critiques of the Policy These recent studies suggest that military laws with regard to homosexuality were outdated relics that persisted because they bolstered the anti-gay prejudice that military leaders deemed necessary for the military to operate effectively. The policies that excluded homosexuals from service in the military have been criticized on a number of grounds. Rather than preserving group cohesion, the policy, critics say, actually promoted divisiveness. Moreover, it proved to be an expensive policy that promoted a hostile working environment, wasted crucial resources on unnecessary investigations, and forced many qualified service members to leave the military, depriving the services of many needed talents. In spite of the laws and regulations prohibiting homosexual conduct and homosexual personnel, gay men and lesbians continued to serve in the U. S. military, as they always have done, often with distinction. As many scholars and critics of those laws and regulations have argued, the lives of gay and lesbian military personnel and the military itself are likely to be decidedly improved now that the military has abandoned the outmoded policies and committed itself to promote tolerance in its ranks.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
social sciences >> Overview: Military Culture: European social sciences >> Overview: Military Culture: United States social sciences >> ACLU LGBT & AIDS Project social sciences >> Ben-Shalom, Miriam social sciences >> Bowers v. Hardwick / Lawrence v. Texas social sciences >> Cammermeyer, Margarethe social sciences >> Don't Ask, Don't Tell social sciences >> Matlovich, Leonard P., Jr. social sciences >> Romer v. Evans
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Bibliography | ||
Canaday, Margot. "The Effect of Sodomy Laws on Lifting the Ban on Homosexual Personnel: Three Case Studies." Santa Barbara, Calif.: Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military, 2001. www.gaymilitary.ucsb.edu/Publications/canaday2.htm. Evans, Rhonda. "U. S. Military Policies Concerning Homosexuals: Development, Implementation, and Outcomes." Santa Barbara, Calif.: Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military, 2001. www.gaymilitary.ucsb.edu/Publications/evans1.htm. Haggerty, Timothy. "History Repeating Itself: A Historical Overview of Gay Men and Lesbians in the Military before 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.'" Don't Ask, Don't Tell: Debating the Gay Ban in the Military. Aaron Belkin and Geoffrey Bateman, eds. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003. 9-50. Halley, Janet E. Don't: A Reader's Guide to the Military's Anti-Gay Policy. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1999. Jacobson, Peter D. "Sexual Orientation and the Military: Some Legal Considerations." Out in Force: Sexual Orientation and the Military. Gregory M. Herek, Jared B. Jobe, and Ralph M. Carney, eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996. 39-64. Osburn, C. Dixon. "A Policy in Desperate Search of a Rationale: The Military's Policy on Lesbians, Gays, and Bisexuals." University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review 64 (1995): 203-13. Servicemembers Legal Defense Network. "An Analysis of Sodomy Cases on Appeal." Unpublished study. 2002.
|
| Citation Information | ||||
| Author: | Bateman, Geoffrey W. | |||
| Entry Title: | Military Law: United States | |||
| General Editor: | Claude J. Summers | |||
| Publication Name: | glbtq: An Encyclopedia of Gay, Lesbian,
Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Culture |
|||
| Publication Date: | 2004 | |||
| Date Last Updated | September 22, 2011 | |||
| Web Address | www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/military_law_us.html | |||
| Publisher | glbtq, Inc. 1130 West Adams Chicago, IL 60607 |
|||
| Today's Date | ||||
| Encyclopedia Copyright: | © 2002-2006, glbtq, Inc. | |||
| Entry Copyright | © 2004, glbtq, inc. | |||
|
This Entry Copyright © 2004, glbtq, inc. www.glbtq.com
is produced by glbtq, Inc., 1130 West Adams Street, Chicago, IL
60607 glbtq™ and its logo are trademarks of glbtq, Inc. |